THEY’RE JUST NOT THAT INTO US
Seldom do we hear the kind of outrage coming from the gay community as has been directed at President-Elect Barack Obama over his decision to have controversial Pastor Rick Warren deliver the invocation at the Jan. 20 inauguration.
The gay community certainly has ground for being upset. After all, an overwhelming number of people from within our ranks supported Obama in the general election, in spite of the fact that Obama has a rather dubious record of support for gay-related issues. Remember, this is the man who, in an effort to drum up support from black voters, spent the latter half of 2007 touring with reputed anti-gay Rev. Donnie McLurkin. The good reverend’s tremendous clout among blacks far outweighed any pushback from gays.
The selection of Warren for such a prominent role in the inauguration is not necessarily a ringing endorsement for his views on homosexuality, but are far from a repudiation. Warren opposes gay marriage and has equated homosexuality with pedophila and other sexual ills. There’s nothing new here, we’ve heard it all before by other evangelicals. Personally, views on homosexuality not withstanding, I admire Warren for his views on poverty, the worldwide AIDS epidemic and living life with purpose and conviction. He has never called on homosexuals to be banished, killed, injured, shamed, or any such thing. He doesn’t hate us. He just doesn’t condone our relationships. There is a huge difference.
But what is most important here to realize is that we should not be surprised that gay people are quickly thrown under the bus by Obama. We are not swing voters and you can take it to the bank that Obama is already planning his re-election campaign in 2012. After all, he has spent the last 13 years running for office instead of actually accomplishing anything.
Politically, we just do not hold the clout we think we do. We have formidable numbers that would form one hell of a voting block if we weren’t so concentrated in liberal strongholds like New York, Chicago, Los Angeles and other big cities. Our numbers are much weaker in the areas that can turn an election on its heels - rural areas in particular. We have more power to influence the outcomes of House of Representative elections and local politics, than we ever can for president. In fact, we are far more a powerful consumer block than a powerful electoral block. We have so rarely won any of our equality battles in the political arena. We win in the courts.
The sooner we realize we are weak in the political sphere, the sooner we can focus our attentions to winning the war on firmer terrain.
































#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9
#10
#11
#12 & 13
#14
#15
#16
#17
#18
#19
#20




